Category: Reports

  • AK035 Q3 2026 Report: The CV Tailor Tool Doubled. Now We Must Fix What It Produces.

    The Short Version

    The AK035 CV Tailor tool grew fast between July and September 2026. It more than doubled.

    But growth is not the whole story. One user told us something we cannot ignore. Their CV was too long for a recruiter to read. That comment matters more than any number in this report.

    Here is what happened, what we learned, and what we are doing next.


    What the Tools Do

    Before the numbers, here is a quick reminder.

    The AK035 platform offers three free tools:

    • CV Tool – Build, improve, or tailor your CV for a specific job
    • Career Guidance Tool – Answer questions about your career path
    • Cover Letter and Email Drafting Tool – Write professional letters and emails

    All three are free. No hidden costs. No expensive services. Just help.


    The Big Change: Tailoring Beat Building

    In Q2 2026, most people used the CV tool to review what they already had.

    In Q3 2026, that flipped. People now want to tailor their CV for a specific job.

    Tool ActionQ2 ShareQ3 Share
    Tailor18.7%46.4%
    Review40.3%24.7%
    Improve27.6%27.6%
    Create1.3%1.3%

    Tailor use grew 169.7% per day. That means more people are taking a CV they already have and aiming it at one job.

    The tool that builds a CV from scratch? Almost nobody uses it. Create dropped from 19 uses to 8.

    What this tells us: People arrive with a CV. They do not want a new one. They want the one they have to work harder.


    Standout Problem: Too Many Words

    Here is where the report gets uncomfortable.

    Backend work grew 24.4% per day. Frontend use grew 9.0% per day. That means each visit now produces more text than before.

    Then a user wrote this:

    “It’s a lot. Like the CV summary is long, the key skills, etc. Most recruiters prefer a CV that’s straight to the point and easy to read. A CV they can scan not a CV that takes more than 3min to read through.”

    That user rated the tool 3 stars. They described their own reading experience, not a guess about what recruiters want.

    We treat this as an open defect, not a preference.

    If a recruiter cannot scan your CV in three minutes, the CV fails. It does not matter how good the words are.


    Satisfaction: Mostly Good, But the Floor Fell

    18 people left feedback between July and August. September recorded none.

    RatingEntries
    5 stars12
    4 stars3
    3 stars1
    2 stars1
    1 star1

    Mean rating: 4.33 out of 5. That is down from 4.69 in Q2.

    The 2-star and 1-star ratings arrived on the same day in July. They came from two different sessions. No words explained what went wrong.

    What this means: 16 sessions rated out of 291 that logged actions. The 4.33 describes people motivated enough to rate, not everyone who used the tool.

    Median satisfaction stayed at 5 stars. Most raters remain happy. But we cannot fix what we cannot see.

    What users wrote. Five of 18 entries carried text.

    “Great tool which improved my cv” – improve, 5 stars, Bojanala Platinum

    “I loved it” – improve, 5 stars, Mangaung

    “I thought you where going to make me a new CV” – review, 5 stars, Mangaung

    “Very good” – improve, 4 stars, City of Johannesburg

    “It’s a lot. Like the CV summary is long, the key skills, etc. Most recruiters prefer a CV that’s straight to the point and easy to read. A CV they can scan not a CV that takes more than 3min to read through” – improve, 3 stars, City of Ekurhuleni

    What this supports. Four of the five comments praise the tools. One names a defect. Written comment rates rose in proportion, from 4 of 35 entries in Q2 to 5 of 18, which is 27.8 per cent against 11.4 per cent.

    What this cannot support. 16 sessions rated out of 291 sessions that logged actions, a response rate of 5.5 per cent. The 4.33 mean describes people motivated enough to rate, not the audience. The 2 star and 1 star entries carried no words, so the data cannot say what went wrong on 29 July.


    Who Is Using the Platform

    Where They Come From

    DistrictQ3 ActionsQ2 Actions
    City of Tshwane11771
    City of Johannesburg93121
    Unknown9014
    City of Ekurhuleni5160
    Outside South Africa462

    Tshwane took the lead from Johannesburg. It also carried the heaviest tailoring load, with 73 of its 117 actions being tailor requests.

    Gauteng municipalities held 46.9% of all activity. KwaZulu-Natal held 12.5%. Western Cape held 7.4%.

    One problem: 90 rows carried the label “Unknown.” That is up from 14 in Q2. We cannot say where those users came from. That limits what we can learn.


    Career Guidance: Small but Rising

    The Career Guidance tool ran 29 times across 22 days in Q3. That is tiny compared to 608 CV actions.

    But September reached 14 requests. July had 7. That is a doubling, though from a very small base.

    31 people completed a career guidance profile. Here is who they are:

    • Age: Youngest 21, oldest 43, mean 28.7
    • Education: 41.9% hold a degree or higher
    • Location: 51.6% from Gauteng, 25.8% from KwaZulu-Natal

    Location

    ProvinceUsersShare
    Gauteng1651.6%
    KwaZulu-Natal825.8%
    Free State26.5%
    North West26.5%
    Limpopo26.5%
    Western Cape13.2%

    Education

    QualificationUsers
    Diploma11
    Bachelor’s Degree8
    Grade 12 or Matric5
    Honours Degree5
    Certificate2

    13 of 31 users, or 41.9 per cent, hold a degree or higher, against 33.3 per cent in Q2. Nobody holds a Master’s degree this quarter, where Q2 had one.

    What They Told Us

    ProblemUsersShare
    No responses from employers1858.1%
    Career guidance722.6%
    Finding jobs412.9%
    Upskilling26.5%

    Roughly six in ten hold a qualification, apply, and hear nothing back. That figure held steady across two quarters.

    How Long They Have Searched

    DurationUsers
    More than 2 years10
    1 to 2 years7
    3 to 6 months5
    6 to 12 months4
    Less than 3 months4

    17 of 31 users, or 54.8%, have searched longer than a year. In Q2, that figure was 37.5%. People arriving now have been knocking on doors longer than the group before them.

    What They Will Accept

    • Office-based: 80.6%
    • Willing to relocate: 80.6%
    • Remote work: 71.0%
    • Hybrid work: 67.7%
    • Willing to start a business: 22.6%

    Eight in ten would move province for work. Locality does not protect a job seeker here.


    The Traffic Story: One Week Carried September

    The daily traffic export covers 4 September to 30 September. July and August produced no daily records.

    What 27 days showed:

    • Page views: 1,423
    • Impressions: 3,029
    • Clicks: 109

    Five days from 14 to 18 September carried 633 page views. That is 44.5% of the September window in five days.

    The last seven days produced 269 page views. The first seven produced 321.

    The spike was one event, not lasting growth.


    Devices: Phones Rule, But Ads Suffer

    The device export says 79.3% of page views come from high-end mobile phones. Desktop takes 20.1%.

    Phone users produce 94.3% of clicks. But phone users see fewer ads than desktop users.

    • Mobile ad visibility: 56.0%
    • Desktop ad visibility: 71.4%

    Where an ad sits on a small screen decides whether a free tool stays free.

    The device export disagrees with September’s daily rows by 3.04 times. We cannot resolve that conflict, so both figures appear as given.


    Ten questions the quarter answers

    1. Do users want to build a CV or improve one they already have? They want an existing CV aimed at one job. Tailor led at 282 actions and grew 169.7 per cent per day. Create, the tool that builds from nothing, fell to 8 uses.
    2. Is the tailor rise real, or a tracking failure? Real. Inside named districts, tailor held 37.5 to 37.9 per cent of activity between July and August while its count grew from 72 to 106. Capture failed on 90 rows, and those failures do not explain the rise.
    3. Which district leads the platform now? City of Tshwane, at 117 actions against Johannesburg’s 93. Tshwane also runs the heaviest tailor mix, 73 of its 117 actions.
    4. Are users satisfied? Mostly, on thin evidence. 12 of 18 ratings were 5 stars. Two low scores on one July day pulled the mean to 4.33. 16 sessions rated out of 291.
    5. Is the career guidance tool being used? Barely. It ran 29 times across 22 days, against 608 CV actions. September doubled July’s monthly rate from a small base.
    6. Can 31 profile completions speak for the user base? No. These people chose to fill in a long form. They hold more degrees than the national average, and they cluster in Gauteng. They describe the most motivated end of the audience.
    7. What frustrates users most? Silence. 18 of 31 named no responses from employers. That figure held near six in ten for two quarters.
    8. Are people finding work quickly? No, and it worsened. 17 of 31 have searched longer than a year, against 37.5 per cent in Q2. Ten passed the two-year mark.
    9. Did the September traffic spike mean lasting growth? No sign of it. Five days from 14 to 18 September carried 633 page views, 44.5 per cent of the September window. The last seven days then produced 269 page views against 321 in the first seven. The spike was one event, and the window opened on it.
    10. Do users want to move for work? Yes. 25 of 31 would relocate. Q2 recorded 79.2 per cent willing to relocate, and the appetite held while the search dragged on.

    What We Are Doing Next

    We set seven priorities for Q4 2026. Here are the ones that matter most to you.

    1. Capture the District on Every Tailor Request

    Target: Cut unknown-district rows from 14.8% to under 5% by 31 December 2026.

    Why: We cannot improve what we cannot measure.

    2. Measure the Length of Every CV

    Target: A length figure recorded for every tailor and improve request by 30 November 2026.

    Why: The 3-star comment and the 24.4% rise in tokens per use make this the clearest open defect. We need to know how long our CVs are before we can shorten them.

    3. Test a Shorter CV Output

    Target: Lift the mean rating above 4.50 with at least 30 entries in the quarter.

    Why: A CV that takes more than three minutes to read fails the user. We will offer a two-page output as the default.

    4. Ask Unhappy Users What Went Wrong

    Target: A written reason attached to every rating of 3 or lower by 31 December 2026.

    Why: Two low scores on one day with no words cannot be fixed.

    5. Offer Career Guidance to Repeat Tailor Users

    Target: Lift guidance runs from 29 to 75 in the quarter.

    Why: Someone reshaping one CV across 12 attempts needs direction, not another rewrite.


    The Bottom Line

    The CV Tailor tool grew because people want their existing CV aimed at a specific job. That is clear.

    But growth exposed a problem. The tool produces too many words. One user said it plainly. A recruiter cannot scan a CV that takes more than three minutes to read.

    We are fixing that. We are measuring CV length. We are testing shorter outputs. We are asking unhappy users what went wrong.

    Information should be free, simple, and actionable. That is the AK035 belief. A CV that nobody reads is none of those things.


    Try the Tools

    Build a CV for free, work through the career guidance tool, or draft a cover letter at ak035.co.za

    Read the other quarterly reports at ak035.co.za/reports


    References

    Statistics South Africa (2026) Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 2: 2026. Statistical release P0211. Pretoria: Stats SA. Published 11 August 2026.

    South African Government News Agency (2026) SA official unemployment rate rises to 33.6%. Pretoria: SAnews.gov.za.


    Website List

  • AK035 Q2 2026 Report: How South Africans Used Free Career Tools in the 2nd Quarter 2026

    The Pulse: Who and What

    Users choose active CV building over passive review by a ratio of 1.4 to one. People did not want to sit back and receive feedback. They wanted to act. They wanted to change something and move forward.

    Platform Usage Snapshot

    • Total page views: 5,867
    • Total impressions: 12,836
    • Total clicks: 310
    • Users hit “improve” and “tailor” more than “review” when it comes to CV tools
    • Peak traffic month: June with 2,347 page views
    • Device breakdown: High-end mobile devices drove 4,754 page views and 294 clicks. Desktop followed with 1,090 page views. Tablets recorded 23 page views.

    Platform Traffic Overview

    Derived from AdSense data for Q2 2026:

    MonthPage ViewsImpressionsClicks
    April1,6511,97691
    May1,8694,517104
    June2,3476,343115
    Total5,86712,836310

    Monthly trend: Traffic increased each month. June recorded the highest page views (2,347) and impressions (6,343). April was the quietest month, which is expected as the quarter began.

    Peak traffic days: The data does not include specific peak traffic dates.

    Active View Viewable rate: The platform achieved a 0.606 Active View Viewable rate for South African traffic. This means about 60% of displayed ads were actually viewable to users.

    User Input Aggregate for career guidance

    • 24 profile completions were tracked on the career guidance tool between May 27 and June 22.
    • Gauteng led with 12 users. Western Cape followed with 3 users. North West and KwaZulu-Natal contributed 2 users each.
    • Top qualifications cited: Certificate (6), Diploma (5), Bachelor’s Degree (5).
    • Bottom qualifications: Honours Degree (1), Master’s Degree (1), Grade 11 (1).
    • Gauteng users hold more certificates and diplomas. Degree-level qualifications appear less frequently on the platform.

    Education levels among users:

    QualificationNumber of Users
    Certificate6
    Diploma5
    Bachelor’s Degree5
    Grade 12 / Matric2
    Honours Degree1
    Master’s Degree1
    Grade 111

    The job search reality: 8 users had been looking for work for 3 to 6 months. 5 users had been searching for more than two years. That is a long time to face rejection or silence.

    Work preferences:

    • Office-Based: 14 users
    • Willing to Relocate: 14 users
    • Remote Work: 13 users
    • Hybrid Work: 12 users
    • Willing to start a business: 6 users

    Field Note: Thirteen users reported getting no responses from employers. Half of these users hold diplomas or certificates. One might assume their qualifications are the problem, but the data do not show skill gaps. The real issue lies in how they present their existing skills. This frustration drives demand for active CV revamps.

    The Breakdown: Where, When and Why

    Regional Engagement Map for CV Tools

    • City of Johannesburg: 80 tool interactions, leading all districts.
    • City of Ekurhuleni: 44 interactions, showing strong Gauteng presence.
    • City of Tshwane: 41 interactions.
    • Gauteng municipalities accounted for 165 tracked interactions. KwaZulu-Natal municipalities followed with 51 interactions.
    • School names remain unavailable. Towns and districts serve as location markers. Province data comes from user profiles only.

    Traffic and Behaviour Log

    • May 5 recorded 50 backend requests, making it the highest single day for backend activity.
    • June recorded the highest frontend traffic with 2,347 page views.
    • May followed with 1,869 page views.
    • April was the quietest month for page views, with 1,651.
    • Time-of-day breakdown is unavailable.

    CV Tool Usage Breakdown

    • “Improve” (CV revamp): 118 requests
    • “Review” (CV feedback): 154 requests
    • “Tailor” (CV customisation): 87 requests
    • “Create” (new CV): 16 requests
    • CV tools combined (improve, tailor, create): 221 requests
    • “Review” standalone: 154 requests
    • Ratio of active CV tools to review: 1.4 to one, meaning people did not want to sit back and receive feedback. They wanted to act. They wanted to change something and move forward.
    • Backend requests confirm the CV tool handled 391 requests. The cover letter and email tool handled 32 requests. The career guidance tool processed 3 requests.
    • “Review” may function as a CV review rather than pure career guidance.

    Top districts by CV tool interactions:

    DistrictTool Interactions
    City of Johannesburg80
    City of Ekurhuleni44
    City of Tshwane41
    City of eThekwini26
    West Rand11
    King Cetshwayo10
    City of Cape Town9
    Unknown9
    Ugu6

    What stands out: Gauteng dominates platform usage. The province accounted for the highest number of both user registrations and tool interactions. This matches the province’s large population and high job-seeking activity.

    Note: School and town names were not available in the data. Tracking used districts and municipalities instead.

    What CV Tools Users Told Us

    Feedback entries received: 38

    Ratings breakdown:

    RatingNumber of Entries
    5 stars31
    4 stars4
    3 stars2
    2 stars0
    No rating1

    Average rating: 4.86 out of 5

    User Satisfaction

    • 31 five-star ratings, 4 four-star ratings, 2 three-star ratings.
    • 4 reviews included written feedback.
    • Lower ratings lack comments. The data cannot explain the reasons behind them.

    Feedback by tool type:

    Tool TypeFeedback Entries
    Improve13
    Review12
    Create4
    Tailor2

    Written reviews (4 entries):

    “Very easy to use, fast and reliable results. I’m happy” – Ehlanzeni

    “Midrand, Halfway-Gardens” – City of Johannesburg

    “Nothing like this.” – City of eThekwini

    “The service is good” – Zululand

    District feedback breakdown: The City of Johannesburg led with 14 entries. City of Ekurhuleni and City of eThekwini each had 3 entries. 10 entries had a blank district field.

    Sessions with lower ratings: 6 sessions received ratings of 4 stars or lower. These were spread across 4-star (3 sessions) and 3-star (3 sessions) ratings. No 2-star or 1-star ratings were recorded.

    What this tells us is that users are generally satisfied. The high 5-star rating suggests the tools are meeting expectations. However, the written feedback is limited in detail. We cannot fully explain the lower ratings without more written comments.

    Who Filled Out Career Guidance Profiles

    Twenty-four people completed the career guidance profile between 27 May and 22 June 2026. That is roughly one new profile per day. The tracking started late, so this number only captures the final four weeks of the quarter.

    User Input Aggregate:

    • 24 profile completions tracked this quarter
    • Gauteng led with 12 users (50.0%)
    • Western Cape followed with 3 users (12.5%)
    • North West and KwaZulu-Natal each contributed 2 users (8.3% each)
    • Free State and Limpopo each contributed 1 user
    • Top qualifications cited: Certificate (6 users), Diploma (5 users), Bachelor’s Degree (5 users)
    • Bottom qualifications: Grade 11 (1 user), Master’s Degree (1 user), Honours Degree (1 user)
    • 2 users cited grade 12 or Matric
    • Gauteng users hold more certificates and diplomas. Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal users show more degree-level qualifications.

    API vs Frontend Gap

    • Backend requests tracked: 428 total across the quarter.
    • Frontend tool interactions tracked: 461 total across Q2.
    • API log for the career guidance tool covers May 27 to June 22 only.
    • Usage logs cover the full Q2 period.
    • These systems track different actions. Do not add them together.

    The AK035 CV Tool accounts for 96.5% of all backend spend and requests. Cover letter drafting is the secondary use case, with the Career Guidance Tool making minimal impact on backend activity.

    Research Output

    Do users prefer to build new CVs or improve existing ones?
    Users choose “Improve” (118 requests) over “Create” (16 requests) by a ratio of more than 7 to 1. People already have CVs. They want to fix what they have, not start from scratch.

    Which province drives platform activity?
    Gauteng users account for the highest number of career guide users (12 out of 24) and the most CV tools interactions (City of Johannesburg alone had 80). The province is our primary audience.

    Are users satisfied with the tools?
    Average rating of 4.86 out of 5 across 38 feedback entries suggests strong satisfaction. Written reviews describe the tools as “easy to use” and “good.”

    Is the Career Guidance Tool being used?
    Minimal use. This tool has not gained traction compared to the CV tools.

    What is the gap between frontend and backend activity?
    Frontend usage logs show 463 entries, while backend API logs show 428 requests. These are different systems measuring different activities. The numbers cannot be compared directly.

    Do users prefer to build new CVs or improve existing ones?
    Data shows “improve” and “tailor” together outnumber “create” by 12.8 to one. Assuming users want to start from scratch ignores that most job seekers already have a document they are trying to fix.

    Can we trust the 24 career guidance profiles to represent all users?
    No. These 24 users self-selected into a specific tool. Their education levels and job search durations do not necessarily reflect the broader audience of 5,867 page views.

    What is the biggest frustration for job seekers?
    Thirteen users report getting no responses from employers.

    Are people finding jobs quickly?
    Eight users searched for 3 to 6 months. Five users searched for over 2 years.

    How do users access the platform?
    High-end mobile devices generate 81% of page views. Assuming all users have low-end devices is wrong. They use capable phones but still need free, simple tools.

    Do users want to move for work?
    Fourteen users will relocate. Fourteen users prefer office-based work. Thirteen users want remote work.

    Areas for Next Quarter

    1. Encourage more written feedback.
      Owner: Lungelo Shandu. Target: Increase written review count from 4 to at least 15 entries by end of Q3 2026. Add a prompt after tool use asking users: “What worked well? What could be better?”
    2. Promote the Career Guidance Tool.
      Owner: Lungelo Shandu. Target: Increase tool usage from 3 to 15 requests by end of Q3 2026. Create a short explainer video showing how the tool helps with career decisions. Test a simple landing page that explains what the tool offers.
    3. Strengthen Gauteng engagement.
      Owner: Lungelo Shandu. Target: Partner with 3 community organisations in Gauteng to introduce the tools to job seekers who may not find the platform organically. Measure referral traffic and tool usage from these partnerships.
    4. Capture feedback reasons for lower ratings.
      Owner: Lungelo Shandu. Target: Add an optional text field for all ratings under 5 stars by August 31.
    5. Close the data gap between frontend usage logs and backend API tracking.
      Owner: Lungelo Shandu. Target: Align both systems to capture 100% of tool interactions from day one of Q3.

    Data Notes

    • Report period: Q2 2026 (April, May, June)
    • Data sources: phpMyAdmin, AdSense and OpenRouter
    • API usage logs and usage_logs are separate systems. API tracks backend request counts by date. Usage logs track frontend tool interactions by session and district. These numbers cannot be combined.
    • School names and town names were not available. District and municipality data were used instead.
    • Excluded from this report: AI model names, provider details, and revenue figures.
    • Backend figures and other stats will mismatch due to the difference in input tracking from tools, and reports are based on final figures and outputs.

    Visit our main page for our CV tools, online career guidance and job-seeking resources: ak035.co.za

    View our reports: ak035.co.za/reports